Better shortlists, not just longer lists
Students choosing further study face thousands of options and uneven information. Counsellors have limited time per student. Recommendations work when they are transparent: a student should see why a programme appears on their list and what would change it.
Acadlytic is designed to match a student’s profile against programme data from the post-secondary school database and explain each match in plain language.
Planned matching criteria
Academic fit
Subjects, grades and entrance requirements compared against programme expectations.
Interests & goals
Career interests and preferred fields of study.
Practical constraints
Location, budget, duration and study mode.
Balance
A mix of ambitious, target and likely options, labelled clearly.
Designed for responsible guidance
- Counsellors can review, add or remove recommendations before students see them
- Every match shows the criteria that produced it
- Students can adjust preferences and see how results change
- No institution pays for placement in results
Frequently asked questions
Who uses college recommendations?
Schools, counselling teams and education partners who guide students toward further study, and the students themselves.
How are recommendations generated?
By matching a student’s academic profile, interests and practical constraints against structured programme data. Every suggestion shows the criteria that produced it.
Can institutions pay to appear in recommendations?
No. Sponsored placement is not part of the design, and counsellors will be able to review recommendations before students see them.